..."Clinton and Bush totally were aware of the use of DU and made conscious choices to disregard the law," said Rokke. "The world needs to know about it: It's a horrible mess and it will continue until someone holds these people accountable for what they've done and demands compliance. The children of the world don't deserve this." The Pentagon took 25 years to acknowledge problems with the corrosive defoliant Agent Orange, used in Vietnam to destroy the jungle. It took 40 years before sick WWII veterans were compensated for exposure to atomic bomb radiation. Officials today can't say, "We didn't know," because they are fully aware of the dangers of DU. How long will it take them to stop using radioactive ammunition and exposing soldiers and civilians to genetic damage, cancer and other illnesses?...
[27460] |
Uruknet on Alexa
:: Segnala Uruknet agli amici. Clicka qui.
:: Invite your friends to Uruknet. Click here.
:: Segnalaci un articolo :: Tell us of an article
:: If you find this site informative, please donate -
every donation helps us keep up with costs. Thanks.
:: If you find this site informative, please donate -
every donation helps us keep up with costs. Thanks.
|
|
"The Children of the World Don't Deserve" The Case Against Depleted Uranium
DON MONKERUD
 |
October 14, 2006
When the US Army advertises for recruits, it emphasizes jobs and benefits the Army offers, but nowhere are prospects informed about the risk of illness, sickness and death caused by the Army's use of radioactive munitions.
On September 7, in the first court case on Gulf War I to reach Federal Court, nine veterans from a National Guard unit argued their case before a judge in New York, claiming the Army violated its own safety protocols by exposing them to radioactive depleted uranium and refusing to provide medical care. Representing the US Army, Assistant US Attorney John Cronan asked the court to dismiss the lawsuit immediately because courts can't decide "sensitive military matters" and a 1950 Supreme Court decision ruled that soldiers can't sue the government for injuries caused by their military service. The Court has not reached a decision.
Depleted uranium remains a nagging problem for the US Army, which extensively used such munitions during fighting in Gulf War I, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan and Iraq. DU is a chemically toxic, radioactive element with a half-life of 4.5 billion years that damages the kidneys and lungs, causes genetic mutations and cancer, and is associated with a number of medical problems.
The US nuclear industry has produced 1.2 billion pounds of DU waste as a by-product of nuclear energy and weapons production. This nuclear waste is being recycled into DU munitions, which many believe were given to Israel in the form of armor piercing shells for use in the 1973 Sinai war. Since then, DU has been tested, manufactured and sold to a number of countries by US arms manufacturers. Considered highly-effective in penetrating armor, uranium munitions are used by the main US Abrams battle tanks, Bradley Fighting vehicles, A-10 attack aircraft and a host of other ammunition, including bunker busters.
Upon impact, DU munitions burn at 3000 to 6000 degrees Centigrade and combust into a radioactive gas of fine particles of uranium oxide dust, which remain suspended in the air and, once inhaled, become a chronic source of uranium heavy metal and contact radiation poisoning. Estimates vary on the total tonnage of DU used by the US and include: during the US bombing of Yugoslavia, 34 tons of DU; in Gulf War I, up to 375 tons; in Afghanistan in 2001, 1,000 tons; and in Gulf War II in 2003, up to 2,200 tons.
The release of radioactive and chemically toxic dust and uranium fragments causes serious medical problems. According to Leuren Moret, an independent scientist and international radiation specialist, depleted uranium is considered a factor in Gulf War syndrome, which affects many of the 325,000 Gulf War I veterans who are on permanent medical disability.
In August 2004, the VA reported that over 518,739 Persian Gulf veterans were on medical disability since 1991. Moret attributes many of these disabilities to DU exposure. Although some remain controversial, Moret compiled a list of 100 illnesses that veterans associated with DU, including brain tumors, Hodgkin lymphoma, leukemia, rectal cancer, Parkinson's disease, respiratory problems, rashes, kidney and eye problems, and thyroid cancer. Others point to definite connections between DU and brain tumors, and Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
"Under international law, depleted uranium meets the definition of WMD and violates US military law as well as the Geneva and Hague conventions," says Moret. "There has been a cover-up by three administrations including Bush Senior, Clinton and Bush the younger because reparations, which the countries attacked are entitled to, would bankrupt the US."
The Pentagon asserts that DU "is only mildly radioactive" and a White House website stated that reports of health problems and cancers caused by DU are propaganda, although a US Army report by Col. E. Wakayama in August 2002, confirms serious health and environmental problems. The report recommends long-term sampling of water and milk from sites heavily contaminated with DU and the removal of contaminated soil from populated areas.
Vietnam and Gulf War veteran and former US Army Depleted Uranium Project director Doug Rokke charges that the Department of Defense (DOD) deliberately ignores its own orders for testing soldiers who come in contact with DU. In August, 1993, General Eric Shinseki issued an order requiring training for anyone who "may come in contact" with DU equipment, complete medical testing for solders "exposed to DU contamination," and the development of "a plan for DU contaminated equipment." Rokke cites a number of other orders including an April 2004 Surgeon General's order and US Army regulations requiring medical and environmental clean up from DU contamination.
Rokke charges government and political officials with a deliberate cover-up to limit liability and to ensure uranium munitions use during combat. He insists that DOD officials provide medical care for all DU casualties, complete environmental mediation, and complete decontamination of all DU damaged equipment, structures, and terrain as required by US regulations. He also emphasizes that documented health problems exist in many of the 55 US locations where DU is stored, processed and tested.
"Clinton and Bush totally were aware of the use of DU and made conscious choices to disregard the law," said Rokke. "The world needs to know about it: It's a horrible mess and it will continue until someone holds these people accountable for what they've done and demands compliance. The children of the world don't deserve this."
The Pentagon took 25 years to acknowledge problems with the corrosive defoliant Agent Orange, used in Vietnam to destroy the jungle. It took 40 years before sick WWII veterans were compensated for exposure to atomic bomb radiation. Officials today can't say, "We didn't know," because they are fully aware of the dangers of DU. How long will it take them to stop using radioactive ammunition and exposing soldiers and civilians to genetic damage, cancer and other illnesses?
Don Monkerud is an Aptos, California-based writer who follows cultural, social and political issues.
|
|
:: Article nr. 27460 sent on 14-oct-2006 17:46 ECT
www.uruknet.info?p=27460
Link: www.counterpunch.org/monkerud10142006.html
:: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website.
|
COMMENTS BY READERS OF URUKNET
The COMMENTs of our readers are the sole responsability of their authors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of URUKNET. If you believe that any COMMENT contains pornographic, racist or otherwise objectionable or offensive content, or if the COMMENT is contrary to law in any way, please let us know. Our legal representatives will review any and all complaints and, if any complaint is deemed to be accurate, the COMMENT will removed at once.
Comments must be pertinent to the article and must not exceed 5000 characters.
To publish long comments, send it to the our Editor, it can become an article.
Do not complain to the Editor if you do not agree with an article or with a comment: simply reply here below.
You can get the password to become a REGISTERED USER and POST YOUR COMMENTS by clicking HERE (needed only once forever).
Click HERE to post your own comment. Now, also users not registered can post their comments.
| Comment pos ted: by don robertson on 14 Oct 2006 - 20:11 | There is absolutely nothing empirical science has given humanity humanity cannot live without. There is a great multitude of things empirical science has given humanity that it cannot live with.
Ironically empiricism doesn't even stand the test of its own methodology. It is all gobbledygook. Not even mathematics makes empirical sense under close scrut inty.
2+2 does not equal four. Look at the picture. Do two kids that look like this child added to two other kids who don't look like this child add up to four?
For all its effect, given to us by empirical scientists' dream and promise of ma king life better for humanity, it is clear, empirical science is closer to witch craft, than it is anywhere near to truth, human truth.
I have shattered the millenia-old philosophic barrier of the <i>cogito< /i> by dismantling empirical thought entirely.
It is possible to enjoy life. I do. Don't you?
I only wish this child's life could be better enjoyed, and all the children who will follow all of us into this world.
I was once a child. And, you were too.
Don Robertson, The American Philosopher
Limestone, Maine
An Illustrated Philosophy Primer for Young Readers
Precious Life - Empirical Knowledge
The Grand Unifying Theory & The Theory of Time
http://www.geocities.com/donaldwrobertson/index.html
Art Auctions:
http://www.artbyus.com/auctions.php?a=6&b=4807 |
| Comment pos ted: by gabriel on 16 Oct 2006 - 22:00 | I have read very many such articles on the subject of depleted uranium, and find that virtually every one of them references the same sources, none of which app ear to be at all credible. I have no problem with the idea that if something is as harmful as those claiming DU is, that it should be addressed – vigorously – b ut so far all the data presented is purely anecdotal, vaguely circumstantial and without substance.
Case-in-point: the image of a deformed child, placed in direct connection with t his article. This is a very common approach used in such publications. There is NO solid, or even probable evidence that DU causes such teratogenic effects. All of the literature written (at least that I have read, and that constitutes much ) on the subject, connects DU with the terrible birth defects pictured in the associated photographs, and does so merely, and only, by association. The same logic could be applied by displaying a chicken next to the child, and claiming that exposure to DU causes a child to lay eggs. The comparisons; the inbred, incestuous logic; the self-referencing/circular-referencing of the “proofs” amount to no more than basest application of guilt by association – and extremely distant association at that.
I once contacted Leuren Moret by email with concerns about logical errors and un substantiated claims presented in her and other’s literature. My intent was to h onestly determine if this elemental form of uranium actually causes the problems they have all claimed without any substantive proofs. All I received from her i n response was a terse, one-sentence reply that did no more than prove she had either not read my concerns, or did not care to be bothered by logical conclusions regarding her own position. I asked her (actually, more like pleaded with her) in my response to please provide me with references to peer-reviewed research, or even credible anecdotal information that strongly (or even mildly) connected the listed effects with the cause they claimed for them. I even told her that she would have an ally in this pursuit if she did so. She did not respond. She does not have me as an ally.
Since then, being unwilling to simply write off her concerns as histrionic in na ture, I have listened to and read many of her presentations, and none of them ri se to the level of even remotely credible in source or presentation. They are co mprised of assumptions and illogical conclusions based on other’s assumptions an d illogical conclusions, many of which reference the very same works that reference them. It would be like my saying that the sky if falling, someone then quoting me on that event, and then, as proof that my assumption was correct, I quote them quoting me as corroboration of my thesis – circular referencing. Most of Ms Moret’s presentations are repleat with information that has no connection whatever with DU’s effects on the environment or human physiology. Her offerings are like saying, “I think, therefore fish have gills.” But what she presents is a subject of which the vast majority of her listeners are totally ignorant, so she can very much say whatever she wants and sound quite informed to her audience.
I am certainly no apologist for the military use of DU penetrators – or even lea d bullets, for that matter, as I despise all war and violence – but I have spent considerable time working with radioactive materials, including DU, spending ma ny years in medical research in the field of neurology and neurosurgery, and am very familiar with both its radiological and heavy metal toxicology. I also worked as a nuclear scientist at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, helping engineer the protocols for cleaning up the mess left over from the Manhattan Project. In fact, I legally possess a 4 lb. plate of DU that I have had for many years, and even used as a paper weight, and I'm 62 and still going strong (but if I drop dead from it, you can dismiss all I’ve written here:).
In all the reading and research I have witnessed and participated in, it has bee n found that DU has two considerations of risk. One is that is it a quite toxic heavy metal, like lead, mercury, etc., only a bit less so, and the other popular consideration is its radioactivity.
The radiation aspect of DU is, as referred to in the nuclear industry, a "no-dos e radiation." That means that the gamma is of insufficient energy to ionize cell s or their cytoplasm, and the alpha is incapable of penetrating one's skin (of c ourse, the cell walls of internal organs are much thinner than skin – so the mor al here is, don't eat it). Research shows that aerosolized DU, from impact explosions, results in nearly 100% cermicized particulates, meaning that they are insoluble. So if inhaled, the only “risk” would be radiological in nature, since in order to create a hazard for birth defects, it would necessarily need to be soluble.
The sum of the matter is that DU is much more dangerous as a heavy metal, than a s a radiation hazard. If one were to ingest a quantity sufficient that the alpha radiation became dangerous to the body, he would be dead from the chemical toxi city of it long before the radiation ever had opportunity to do any damage. And the chemical poisoning is less than that of mercury (there is some debate as to its real toxicity), and is not known, in any research I've read, to be responsible for birth defects – especially in the minute quantities one would likely encounter in the Iraqi landscape at large. Being near a war vehicle armored with DU and getting blown up – well, that's quite another matter. I would not want to be present under such circumstances, either. Neither would I want to be downwind from atomized lead for that matter. War is a dangerous business – for all concerned, and they should return to using DU as aircraft aileron counterweights.
One more thought:
If I were to describe an area of real estate that was contaminated with about 6p pm of uranium per cubic meter (about the volume of an American nickel, but in du st form), would you be concerned? I'm not speaking of DU but non-depleted uraniu m, which is about 30%+ more radioactive than DU, and just as toxic, chemically.
Well, that is about the average content of uranium in the earth's crust, not cou nting, of course, where there are concentrations of the raw ore. It is in the du st that virtually every human on earth breathes, because uranium is one of the m ost abundant elements. It's alpha decay is mostly responsible for the heat that keeps the earth's core molten.
My ideas and opinions are not cut in stone, and I never ignore reasonable eviden ce, even if it is anecdotal in nature. The working term here being "reasonable." I have read only one peer-reviewed paper on the potential teratogenetic effects of depleted uranium, and it was inconclusive at best. It failed in addressing m any logical questions that would indicate the dubiousness of many of its conclusions – and its conclusions are that, in sufficient doses, DU can present teratogentic effects. But the so-called evidence of the plethera of articles written on the subject, and “data” presented by Moret, et. al., would lead one to believe that the stuff will chase you down just for the privilege of mauling your DNA.
Really, my entire thesis here is that, as much as I despise what America is doin g in the world, generally, and in Iraq and Muslim lands, specifically, I endorse truth and abhor lies. And if one must fabricate a cause without a foundation an d structure of truth, then they need to find a cause that can be supported by so mething other than intellectual dishonesty. But so far, as stated, I have yet to find any truth in the sensationalistic claims made about depleted uranium.
|
|
[ Printable version
] | [ Send it to a friend ]
[ Contatto/Contact ] | [ Home Page ] | [Tutte le notizie/All news ]
|
|
Uruknet on Twitter
::
RSS updated to 2.0
:: English
:: Italiano
::
Uruknet for your mobile phone:
www.uruknet.mobi
The newsletter archive
|
:: If you find this site informative, please donate -
every donation helps us keep up with costs. Thanks.
|
:: All events
|