November 5, 2006
Two rabbis, visiting Palestine in 1897,
observed that the land was like a bride, "beautiful, but
married to another man". By which they meant that, if a
place was to be found for a Jewish "homeland" in Palestine,
the indigenous inhabitants had to leave. Where should the people
of Palestine go? Squaring that circle has been the essence of
Israelīs dilemma ever since its establishment and the cause
of the Palestinian tragedy that it led to. It has remained insoluble.
Ghada Karmi's new book, Married
To Another Man, Israelīs Dilemma in Palestine, (published
by Pluto Press, London-Ann Arbor) shows that the major reason
for this failure was the original and unresolved Zionist quandary
of how to create and maintain a Jewish state in a land inhabited
by another people. Zionism was never able to resolve the problem
of "the other man".
There are only two ways: Either
the "other man" had to be eradicated, or the Jewish
state project had to be given up. Israel did not do either. It
succeeded in 1948 in expelling and keeping out a large number
of Palestinians, but Israel was never able to "cleanse"
the land of Palestine entirely. The fundamental mistake of the
Zionists was their belief that "the entire land of Palestine
was Jewish and the Arab presence in it a resented foreign intrusion".
All in all, the Zionists were "relatively" successful,
but for the indigenous owners of the land it was a catastrophe
which has been going on until today. "If Israel remains
a colonialist state in its character, it will not survive. In
the end the region will be stronger than Israel, in the end the
indigenous people will be stronger than Israel, " as Akiva
Eldar quoted the former Mazpen member Haim Hangebi in the Israeli
Daily Haaretz on August 8, 2003. The author concludes: "Zionismīs
ethos was not about peaceful co-existence but about colonialism
and an exclusivist ideology to be imposed and maintained by force."
Ghada Karmi is a renowned commentator
on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and a well-known figure on
British radio and TV. She was born in Jerusalem, and forced to
leave as a child in 1948. She grew up in Britain where she became
a physician, academic and writer. Currently, Karmi is a research
fellow and lecturer at the Insitute of Arab and Islamic Studies
at the University of Exeter. She has written several books, including
In Search of Fatima, which was widely praised.
The Zionist dilemma was perfectly
and bluntly expressed by the so-called "post-Zionist"
representative and professor, Benny Morris, which led not only
to an uproar in the scientific community, but also to a deep
disappiontment, because Morris was considered to belong to the
"new historians". In this interview with the daily
Haaretz and in his article in The Guardian he presented himself
as an ardent Zionist. He encapsulates all Zionismīs major
elements, its inherent implausibility as a practical enterprise,
its arrogance, racism and self-righteousness, and the insurmountable
obstacle to it of Palestineīs original population, which
refuses to go away. For his colonialist and racist view he was
severely critiziced by Baruch Kimmerling and many others who
could not understand his attitude.
Morris said incredible things:
"A Jewish state would not have come into being without the
uprooting of 700,000 Palestinians. Therefore it was necessary
to uproot them. There was no choice but to expel that population."
According to him the Zionists made a mistake to have allowed
any Palestinans to remain. "If the end of the story turns
out to be a gloomy one for the Jews, it will because Ben-Gurion
did not complete the transfer of 1948. (...) In other circumstances,
apocalyptic ones, which are liable to be realized in five or
ten years, I can see expulsions. If we find ourselves (...) in
a situation of warfare (...) acts of expulsion will be entirely
reasonable. They may even be essential (...) If the threat to
Israel is existential, expulsion will be justified." Morris
concludes, Zionism is faced with two options: perpetual cruelty
and repression of others, or the end of the enterprise. These
alternatives give the whole enterprise an apocalyptic touch.
For the time being, the Israeli security establishment has chosen
the "iron wall"-concept which refers to a wall of bayonets.
Ghada Karmi shows in one of
her chapters,"The Cost of Israel to the Arabs", that
the price they had to pay was horrendous. She holds not only
Israel but also the West, especially the United States of America,
is responsible for the rejectionist attitude of the Israeli political
class. They just did never consider any compromise. In this chapter
the author describes the damage that Israelīs creation
inflicted on the Arabs, how it has retarded their development
and provoked a reactive and dangerous radicalization. The Arabs
are always asked to be realistic and recognise the facts on the
ground. "The Arabs were expected to make peace with Israel
- and to love it as well." Under the surface Israel has
made much progress towards normalisation with the Arab world.
The Arab leaders have to conceal that truth from their own populations.
Karmi views Western policy in Israelīs case rather strategic
than ideological. The installation of the Jewish state as the
local agent of Western regional self-interest was an effective
way of dividing the Arabs, so as to ensure that they remained
dependent and subjugated." Egypt and Jordan are the best
examples.
In the Chapter "Why do
Jews support Israel?" the author asks "Why did a project,
which was, on the face of it, implausible in the first place
and inevitably destructive of others, succeed so well? Just as
importantly, why did it continue to receive support, despite
a clear record of aggression and multiple breaches of international
law against its neighbours that ensured its survival - not just
as a state but as a disruptive force?" A number of disparate
factors account for the unconditional support for Israel: the
Holocaust and its associated trauma and guilts, the exigencies
of Western regional policy, religious mythology, so-called common
values, and Israel as the "only democracy in the Middle
East" et cetera. It is difficult to find a similar phenomenon
for a state in the 21st Century that gets away with vast human
rights violations, colonial subjugation of another people and
a disdain of international law. Not only for the American Jewish
community but also for many liberal Jews "Israel had taken
on a mythic quality, part-identity, part-religion, and its dissolution,
as a Jewish state, became psychologically and emotionally unthinkable.
The obverse of this coin was of course a paranoid suspicion and
hatred of anyone who threatened Israel in the slightest way."
Karmi describes the Zionist desperate attempt to prove an unbroken
chain between the Jews of Palestine and those of Europe. "Put
like this, the absurditiy of the idea is obvious, but that in
fact was the proposition Zionists wanted people to believe in
order to justify the Jewish `return` to the īhomeland`."
Because the Zionist claim rested on such shaky grounds, Jewish
researchers "tried to use genetics as a way of demonstrating
a link between European (Ashkenazi) Jews and their supposed Middle
Eastern origins by way of finding a common ancestry with Middle
Eastern Jews".
The author discusses the relationship
between the US and Israel and the dominant influence of the "Israel
lobby", especially AIPAC which adopted an right-wing posture,
both in its support for the Likud party in Israel and the political
right in the US, including the Christian Zionists whose belief
system goes like follows: They adhere literally to the Old Testament.
Fundamental was the return of the Jews to the land of Israel,
which was given them by God through the covenant with Abraham.
According to this legacy all the land between the Nile and the
Euphrates was granted to the Jews. The Jewish return to Palestine
(Israel) was essential as a prelude to Christīs Second
Coming; in that sense, Jews were the instrument by which divine
prophecy would be fulfilled. However, they were obliged to convert
to Christianity and rebuild the Jewish Temple. Seven years of
tribulation would follow, culminating in a holocaust or Armageddon,
during which the converted Jews and other godless people would
be destroyed. Only then would the Messiah return to redeem mankind
and establish the Kingdom of God on earth where he would reign
for a thousand years. The converted Jews, restored as Godīs
Chosen People, would enjoy a privileged status in the world.
At the end of all this, they and all the rightous would ascend
to heaven in the final `Rapture`. The Jewish role in all this
meant: "Jews restored to Israel and converted, leading to
the Second Advent, leading to mankindīs redemption."
In chapter four, five and six
the author critizices the so-called peace process, Arafatīs
destructive final role and Israelīs attempt to revive the
Jordanian option. In signing the Oslo agreement, "Arafat
legitimized Zionism, the very ideology that hat created and still
perpetuates the Palestinian tragedy". The Israeli aim to
destroy the Palestinans could not have been better described
as in the words of the Israeli sociologist professor Baruch Kimmerling
who wrote in his book Politicide that the process of gradual
military, political and psychological attrition whose aim was
to destroy the Palestinians as an independent people with a coherent
political and social existence would make them vanish by their
fragmentation and irrelevance. "Forty years of Israeli politicide
had done its work on the Palestine question as a national cause.
The Palestinians, already in an unenviable position of physical
fragmentation after 1948, became politically fragmented with
the Israeli occupation." In her chapter "Solving the
problem Karmi argues that a two-state solution is out of reach.
Consequently, she calls in chapter seven for a one-state solution.
"In a single state, no Jewish settler would have to move
and no Palestinian would be under occupation." The author
thinks that creating a Jewish state was "crazy" at
Herzlīs time and even now therefore "creating a unitary
state of Israel/Palestine, far less implausible than the Zionist
project ever was, should be no less successful".
Refering to Hangebiīs
statement that Israel as a "colonial state" cannot
survive, Karmi proposes an unthinkable idea: "The best solution
to this intractable problem is to turn back the clock before
there was any Jewish state and return history as from there."
But at the end, she turns back to realism: "The clock will
not go back and, although the Jewish state cannot be uncreated,
it might be, so to speak, unmade. The reunification of Palestineīs
shattered remains in a unitary state for all its inhabitants,
old and new, is the only realistic, humane and durable route
out of the morass. It is also the only way for the Israeli Jewish
community (as opposed to the Israeli state) to survive in the
Middle East."
Dr. Ludwig Watzal works as an editor and a journalist
in Bonn, Germany. He has written several books on Israel and
Palestine. He can be reached at: lwatzal@aol.com
|