GI SPECIAL
7E3:
[Thanks
to Mark Shapiro, Military Project, who sent this in.]
“There Are Now Taliban In Every Village”
“Many Of Them Have Rejoined The Movement
After The Savage Attacks Carried Out By Americans”
“The People Who Are Fighting With The
Taliban Are The Brothers, Uncles And Relatives Of Those Killed By The Americans”
“They Have Joined The Taliban And Are
Fighting Because They Want To Avenge Their Brothers, Fathers Or Cousins”
Obama has
shifted the deadly burden of air strikes onto Pakistani border Pashtun tribe
people. This would seem to be an
especially flawed tactic insofar as most Pashtuns adhere to the code of
Pashtunwali where a mal deed against a family member requires revenge. In other words, such attacks causing civilian
injury or death are creating an endless supply of new resistance fighters.
April 30, 2009 Marc W. Herold, RAWA News
[Excerpts]
“Today the people in this region hate
the Americans whereas they were welcomed when they arrived in 2001”
- Raza
Nawaz Tani, head of an association of tribal chiefs in Khost Province
The Taliban in Afghanistan rejected the Obama
offer of reconciliation labeling it as “lunatic” and reiterating
from a position of strength that the withdrawal of foreign troops was the only
way to end the war in Afghanistan.
Why would the Taliban give up anything in
order to join with a failing, corrupt, dysfunctional regime in Kabul?
Reconciliation might have worked in 2003 when
the Karzai regime still had the upper hand.
The latest report (December 2008) of the
International Council on Security and Development (ICOS), a European
think-tank, says the Taliban now hold a permanent presence in 72% of
Afghanistan, up from 54% a year ago.
The lead researcher at ICOS, Norine
MacDonald, is emphatic, “The Taliban are now controlling the political
and military dynamic in Afghanistan.”
The informal spokesman of the so-called
moderate Taliban, Mullah Abdul Salem Zaeff himself said that the Obama troop
surge would merely serve to attract jihadis to the country and moreover the
Taliban movement was united.
Counterinsurgency doctrine
posits 20-25 troops per 1,000 of a country’s population, precisely the
ratio which existed in the basket case called Kosovo in 2008. Richard Pape stated that for a successful
occupation, one needs about one combat soldier for every 40 people in the
country, or 25 soldiers per 1,000 inhabitants.
What that equates to in
Afghanistan would be well over a quarter million Western combat forces in
Afghanistan.
The Afghan ratio in 2008 was a
mere 5.2 and with the Obama surge will only reach 6.4.
If we assume the only hostility comes from
the 14 mn Pashtuns in Afghanistan, the ratio would still be 14.5, a far cry
from the suggested 25.
The evidence is overwhelming that Obama’s
military “solution” – his surge – is a pitiful
half-measure and as the Strasbourg NATO meeting in April demonstrated, Europe
is unwilling to pick up the slack.
Two hundred thousand Pashtuns cross the 2,640
km long border with Pakistan daily. Clearly, such a border cannot be sealed.
The chimera of building up the Afghan
National Police needs to be recognized.
According to the U.S.
Government Accountability Office report of June 2008, the $6.2 bn already spent
on creating a functioning Afghan National Police force has not resulted in a
single police unit capable of fulfilling its mission.
Ann Jones presents a sobering account by
inspectors general of the Pentagon and State Department of U.S. efforts to
train the Afghan police,
“They found the number of men trained
(about 30,000) to be less than half the number reported by the administration
(70,000). The training had lasted eight
weeks at most, with no in-the-field experience whatsoever. Only about half the equipment assigned to the
police -- including thousands of trucks -- could be accounted for, and the men
trained were then deemed “incapable of carrying out routine law enforcement
work.”
Mullah Zubiallah Akhund, a Taliban leader in
Uruzgan, believes that foreign attacks helped turn their fight against the
foreigners into a nationwide popular struggle,
“The people who are fighting with the
Taliban are the brothers, uncles and relatives of those killed by the
Americans. They have joined the Taliban
and are fighting because they want to avenge their brothers, fathers or
cousins.
“There are now Taliban in every
village; many of them have rejoined the movement after the savage attacks
carried out by Americans.”
Obama has shifted the deadly burden of air
strikes onto Pakistani border Pashtun tribe people.
This would seem to be an especially flawed
tactic insofar as most Pashtuns adhere to the code of Pashtunwali where a mal
deed against a family member requires revenge.
In other words, such attacks causing civilian injury or death are
creating an endless supply of new resistance fighters.
IRAQ WAR REPORTS
Two U.S. Soldiers Killed, Three Wounded In Ninewa Province (Mosul)
May 2, 2009 Multi National Corps Iraq Public Affairs Office, Camp
Victory RELEASE No. 20090502-02
CONTINGENCY OPERATING BASE SPEICHER, TIKRIT, Iraq – Two
Multi-National Division – North Soldiers were killed and three wounded
during a small arms fire attack at a combat outpost south of Mosul early this
evening.
According to initial reports, an individual dressed in an Iraqi Army
uniform fired on the Coalition forces and was killed in the incident.
Hood Soldier Shot On Dismounted Patrol In Iraq
Apr 29, 2009 The Associated Press
DES MOINES, Iowa — An Army soldier who
grew up in Iowa has died after being shot in Iraq, the military said. The Department of Defense said Sgt. LeRoy O.
Webster, 28, was shot April 25 while on patrol near Kirkuk.
Webster was born in 1980 in Spencer and grew
up in Hartley, said Lt. Col. Greg Hapgood, spokesman for the Iowa National
Guard. He graduated from Hartley-Melvin-Sanborn High School in 1999.
Webster joined the military as a member of
the Iowa National Guard, Hapgood said. In
2002, he was called to duty with an Algona-based National Guard unit that
provided security at a Department of Defense installation in Newport, Ind.
In 2004 and 2005, he served in Afghanistan
with a Council Bluffs-based unit.
After that deployment, Webster moved to Sioux
Falls, S.D., and transferred to active duty Army in 2006, Hapgood said.
From October 2006 to January 2008, he served
with the Army in Baghdad.
Webster’s last deployment to Iraq began
in January, Hapgood said. He was assigned to the 3rd Battalion, 82nd Field
Artillery Regiment, 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division out of Fort
Hood, Texas.
Webster is survived by his wife, Jessica,
three daughters, and his parents.
“LeRoy was a wonderful husband and
terrific dad to his three beautiful daughters. He was proud to serve in the
United States Army,” the family said in a statement Monday night.
Guthrie Soldier Wounded In Iraq
May 2, 2009 TULSA, Okla. (AP)
Oklahoma National Guard officials say an Army National Guard soldier
from Guthrie is recovering at the Walter Reed Medical Center after he was shot
in Iraq.
Cpl. Adam Schuster was in a dismounted patrol in Ramadi, Iraq, when he
was shot in the neck and jaw with a small-caliber gun by an insurgent. Schuster
underwent surgery on Wednesday and is expected to undergo several more
operations before he fully recovers.
Schuster is the first casualty among the Enid-based 45th Fires Brigade,
which deployed 800 troops to Iraq in August. The soldiers are scheduled to
return home this August.
Schuster is a member of Battery B, 1st Battalion of the 158th Field
Artillery in Duncan.
The Guard said the soldier’s immediate family, including his
father, Dan Schuster, and two sisters were flown to Washington this week to be
with him.
The War In Iraq Over At Last!
Only 343 March IED Attacks Kill Or Wound Only 49
Foreign Troops
5.1.09 By Tom Vanden Brook, USA TODAY
[Excerpt]
Attack data show that for the first time the
number of IED attacks in Afghanistan has exceeded those in Iraq.
In March, there were 361
incidents in Afghanistan compared with 343 in Iraq.
In Iraq it takes seven bombs to
wound or kill coalition troops. [Do the
math.]
AFGHANISTAN WAR REPORTS
IED Blast Kills Topekan, 21, In Afghanistan
April 21, 2009 By Ann Marie Bush, CJOnline
Bob DeWater didn’t want his son to join
the military. Ultimately, he gave his
blessing.
“I wanted to say no in hopes it would
stop him,” DeWater said. “But he asked me like a man. I couldn’t
say no.”
Department of Defense officials said Pfc.
Richard A. DeWater, 21, of Topeka, was on a dismounted U.S. Army patrol as a
part of Operation Enduring Freedom near Korengal Valley, Afghanistan, when he
was fatally wounded by an improvised explosive device on April 15.
DeWater, who doesn’t support the wars
in Afghanistan and Iraq, takes consolation knowing his son died doing what he
loved — serving his country.
DeWater spoke with The Topeka Capital-Journal
on Tuesday about his son, who was slated to return home in June.
“When he was 4, he said he wanted to be
(in the military),” he said. “It lit a spark in him. It was a dream
of his.”
Richard “Rick” DeWater moved to
Topeka with his father in May 2007. He was born in San Diego. He and his wife,
Valerie, were married in Topeka in June 2008.
His son was deployed in July. Bob couldn’t bear the thought of losing
his son, but he tried to support him in every way possible.
“What do you think when you learn your
firstborn is going to the most deadliest place in the Middle East?” he
asked. “We talked on the phone or online as much as possible. Missions
were really tough on me. I kept thinking, ‘Something is happening.’
But Rick said no news is good news. I just kept that in mind.”
A FATHER’S LOVE
My son, Rick, he is a hero as well!! I have 2 sons, Nicholas, my youngest. They both probably dunno it, but they are the
apples of my eye, I love them both more then life itself !! This sucks, i know what im thinking / feeling,
i just cant seem to get it out. — Bob DeWater, written on his myspace.com
page
A day or so before his son was killed,
DeWater was online at Yahoo chatting with some friends. He noticed his son’s name flash up on
his computer, indicating Rick was online, too.
“I missed him,” DeWater said he
realized. “I thought, ‘I’ll
just catch him next time.’ I didn’t
know there wasn’t going to be a next time.”
The last time the two spoke on the phone was
right after April 10. Rick seemed “jazzed” about something, his
father said.
“He said he couldn’t talk about
it,” DeWater said. “But he also said he was looking forward to
coming home. Too many of them look forward to coming home, and they don’t.”
That would be the last time he would hear his
son’s voice.
Rick was assigned to the 1st Battalion, 26th
Infantry Regiment, 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 1st Infantry Division, of Fort
Hood, Texas. DeWater said he believes
his son was engaged in battle on or about April 10 when his platoon ambushed a
Taliban unit.
An article written by C.J. Chivers with the
New York Times confirmed Rick’s platoon had indeed ambushed a Taliban
unit a few days before his death, killing at least 13 insurgents.
“That was his platoon,” DeWater
said. “I know he was there. They
wanted revenge on my son’s platoon. My son died for a reason. He saved all of their lives. People have to
know my son. They can’t know him
now, but they can know who he was.”
That is the reason DeWater hasn’t been
reluctant to talk to the media. In fact,
photographs accompanying Chivers’ article show the last few minutes of
his son’s life. The photos don’t bother DeWater, he said, because
it gives him a chance to see his son in action.
As i sit here on this easter sunday, i find
myself thinking yet again. I really dont know much, but i do know i feel very
empty. Every since my two sons left i have been feeling this way, first my
youngest, now 18, went to georgia to live with his mom and step dad, then my oldest
last year left for the army at 21. now, proud as i am, i still cant help but
feel empty inside. — Bob DeWater, written on his myspace.com page
DeWater, who works at the Goodyear Tire &
Rubber Co. plant, received a phone call at 8 p.m. April 15 that shook him to
the core. He was fixing himself some food in his kitchen in North Topeka when
it came.
“My ex-wife told me to sit down,”
DeWater said. “It dawned on me, and I said, ‘Oh God, please tell me
it’s not Rick.’ I don’t remember much after that. Now, I’m
wondering. There’s anger. Hate. Everything recycles. The what ifs. The how
comes. It sucks for it to happen to anyone. It sucks even more it was my son. But I can’t wish this on anyone. I can’t
have someone else go through this.”
DeWater received word Tuesday that his son’s
body was being released. It will be flown to Oregon, where a military ceremony
will be conducted at Roseburg National Cemetery. Rick considered Grants Pass,
Ore., his home.
“He has earned everything I can do for
him and then some,” DeWater said. “Today has been a hellish day of
waiting. I don’t know when
anything will happen.”
His son will be cremated after the military
ceremony.
“I have sacrificed a son, but what have
I gained?” DeWater asked with tears in his eyes.
“But there has to be a plan. I don’t
understand it now, but hopefully, one day, I can. He was amazing. He had a
personality that would draw you in. He loved fishing. He loved guns. He loved
what he was doing. He dedicated himself to it. He believed in what he was
doing.
“It (the war in Afghanistan) has been
drug out too long, and we’re losing money. But I support all of our troops.”
Friends will miss the fallen soldier, too.
Ryan Burge, 23, of Topeka, said he and
several of Rick’s friends met Sunday at Echo Cliff near Dover to remember
their friend.
“He was a great guy,” Burge said.
“He was always set on going into the military. It is a shock that he is
gone.”
Bob said his son’s wife is struggling
with the death but is dealing with it day by day. She remains in Fort Hood,
Texas, where the couple lived.
DeWater also is taking his life day by day
and has undertaken the burden of planning his son’s funeral.
“Rick was my world,” he said. “How
am I getting through? I don’t know
that I am getting through this. I guess
I’m just getting.”
Notes
>From A Lost War:
“‘Do You Have Any Help Here, Or Are
You All Alone?’ Mullen Asked”
“Naseri Replied That The Provincial
Government Consisted Of Him And Four Other Afghans”
“There Are Only 13 U.S. Civilian Development
Experts In All Of Southern Afghanistan”
May 1, 2009 By Greg Jaffe, Washington Post
Staff Writer [Excerpts]
ZABOL, Afghanistan -- In this impoverished
province on the Pakistani border, the U.S. military’s most senior officer
came face to face with the consequences of nearly eight years of American
indifference and neglect in Afghanistan.
Adm. Mike Mullen, the Joint Chiefs of Staff
chairman, sat across from Gov. Mohammad Ashraf Naseri, who nervously stroked
his salt-and-pepper beard and ran through his problems.
“Do you have any help here, or are you
all alone?” Mullen asked during a visit last week.
Naseri replied that the provincial government
consisted of him and four other Afghans.
There was no money coming from the central
government in Kabul.
In the next few months, the Obama
administration plans to move more than 20,000 U.S. soldiers into southern
Afghanistan in an effort to drive the Taliban from places such as the
southeastern province of Zabol.
The new strategy, however, is hampered by the
heavy demand in Iraq and Afghanistan for civilian and military reconstruction
experts.
There are only 13 U.S. civilian development
experts in all of southern Afghanistan, where the Taliban movement is strongest
and the local economy is almost entirely dependent on opium production.
OCCUPATION ISN’T LIBERATION
ALL TROOPS HOME NOW!
U.S. OCCUPATION RECRUITING DRIVE IN HIGH GEAR;
RECRUITING FOR THE ARMED RESISTANCE THAT IS
Foreign occupation soldiers from the U.S.
search an Afghan citizens house during a home invasion in Nerkh district of
Wardak province in west of Kabul, Afghanistan, , May 1, 2009. (AP Photo/Rafiq Maqbool)
[There’s nothing quite
like invading somebody else’s country and busting into their houses by
force to arouse an intense desire to kill you in the patriotic, self-respecting
civilians who live there.
[But your
commanders know that, don’t they?
Don’t they?]
Afghan citizens have no right to resist home
invasions by occupation soldiers from the USA.
If they do, they may be arrested, wounded, or killed.
One of the
squadron’s great successes over the past year, says Lt. Col. Kolenda, has
been weaning less-committed local boys away from the hard-liners through jobs,
schooling and support for the elders.
He says
the young men of Mirdish village, for instance, joined the insurgency because a
couple of years ago American troops kicked down some doors and searched some
homes.
-- Michael
M. Phillips, Wall St. Journal, 7.18.08
[images.google.com]
English
soldiers search an American settler’s house (1770’s)
Declared Bill Ehrhart, a marine
in Vietnam:
In grade school we learned about
the redcoats, the nasty British soldiers that tried to stifle our freedom. Subconsciously, but not very subconsciously,
I began increasingly to have the feeling that I was a redcoat. I think it was one of the most staggering
realizations of my life.
In March “For The First Time, The Number Of
IED Attacks In Afghanistan Has Exceeded Those In Iraq”
“The Attacks In Afghanistan Are Also More
Lethal”
5.1.09 By Tom Vanden Brook, USA TODAY
[Excerpts]
The growing number of roadside bomb attacks
in Afghanistan led commanders there to dramatically increase requests for
armored vehicles needed to replace Humvees, according to documents and
interviews with U.S. defense officials.
“You’ve got a huge country, much
larger than Iraq,” [Army Lt. Gen. Thomas] Metz said in an interview. “Very rural. Very few paved roads.
“So the enemy’s got lots of time
and space to put in IEDs. He generally
does it by digging holes in unpaved roads and burying them for underbelly
attacks. There are thousands of
culverts, so he’ll take advantage of the culverts to pack in a lot of
explosives.”
Attack data show that for the first time the
number of IED attacks in Afghanistan has exceeded those in Iraq.
In March, there were 361 incidents in
Afghanistan compared with 343 in Iraq.
The attacks in Afghanistan are also more
lethal.
Insurgents cause one casualty for every three
bombs they plant there; in Iraq it takes seven bombs to wound or kill coalition
troops, Metz said.
Welcome To Liberated Afghanistan:
“Torture Is Commonplace In Afghan Detention
Facilities”
“Fewer Than 20% Of Afghan Law-Enforcement
Officials Are Aware It’s Illegal To Torture Someone”
May 1, 2009 STEVEN CHASE, The Globe and Mail
OTTAWA -- Fewer than 20 per cent of Afghan
law-enforcement officials are aware it’s illegal to torture someone
accused of a crime in that country, a report by a Canadian government-supported
human-rights watchdog says.
The Afghanistan Independent Human Rights
Commission, whose mandate comes from the Afghan constitution, also says “torture
and cruel, inhumane and belittling behaviour” is widespread among that
country’s law-enforcement agencies. It says Afghan police are alleged to
be responsible for more than 65 per cent of the incidents in its study.
The rights body’s report, which
surveyed 92 Afghan law-enforcement officials and 398 alleged victims of torture
in detention, found that only 17.4 per cent of officials were aware of legal
rights in Afghanistan affording the accused protection from torture.
Only 12 per cent of those surveyed, who
included prosecutors, police and court officials, recognized the rights of the
accused as outlined in the Afghan constitution. Article 29 of the constitution
prohibits torture and declares information obtained through it unusable.
The study, titled The Reasons for Torture by
Law Enforcement Agencies, reported that only about 58 per cent of law-enforcement
officials felt an accused should not be tortured for any reason.
Human-rights groups have said torture is
commonplace in Afghan detention facilities despite Kabul’s claim that
abuses are isolated.
More Notes From A Lost
War:
$250,000: Typical Salary Of Foreign Consultants In Afghanistan:
“To Travel To A Part Of Afghanistan Deemed Wholly Free Of Taliban
By Afghans, She Had To Go By Helicopter And Then Be Taken To Where She Wanted
To Go In An Armoured Vehicle”
May 1, 2009 By Patrick Cockburn in Kabul, Independent News
and Media [Excerpts]
Vast sums of money are being lavished by Western aid
agencies on their own officials in Afghanistan at a time when extreme poverty
is driving young Afghans to fight for the Taliban.
Whole districts of Kabul have already been taken over or
rebuilt to accommodate Westerners working for aid agencies or embassies.
“I have just rented out this building for $30,000 a
month to an aid organisation,” said Torialai Bahadery, the director of
Property Consulting Afghanistan, which specialises in renting to foreigners. “It was so expensive because it has 24
rooms with en-suite bathrooms as well as armoured doors and bullet-proof
windows,” he explained, pointing to a picture of a cavernous mansion.
Though 77 per cent of Afghans lack access to clean water, Mr
Bahadery said that aid agencies and the foreign contractors who work for them
insist that every bedroom should have an en-suite bathroom and this often
doubles the cost of accommodation.
In addition to the expensive housing the expatriates in
Kabul are invariably protected by high-priced security companies and each house
is converted into a fortress. The freedom of movement of foreigners is very
limited.
“I am not even allowed to go into Kabul’s best
hotel,” complained one woman working for a foreign government aid
organisation. She added that to travel
to a part of Afghanistan deemed wholly free of Taliban by Afghans, she had to
go by helicopter and then be taken to where she wanted to go in an armoured
vehicle.
This means that many foreigners sent to Afghanistan to help
rebuild the country and the state machinery seldom meet Afghans aside from
their drivers and a few Afghans with whom they work.
The effectiveness of foreign advisers and experts in
Iraq is often further reduced by the very short time they stay in the country. “Many people move on after six months,”
said one expatriate who did not want to be named.
“In addition some embassy employees receive
two weeks off work for every six weeks they are in the country, on top of their
usual holidays.” [Sounds good. How about the same
deal for the U.S. troops?]
Some 42 per cent of Afghanistan’s 25 million
inhabitants live on less than a dollar a day and life expectancy is only 45
years. Overall literacy rate is just 34 per cent and 18 per cent for women.
But much of the aid money goes to foreign
companies who then subcontract as many as five times with each subcontractor in
turn looking for between 10 per cent and 20 per cent or more profit before any
work is done on the project.
The biggest donor in Afghanistan is the US, whose overseas
aid department USAID channels nearly half of its aid budget for Afghanistan to
five large US contractors.
Examples cited in an Oxfam report include the building of a
short road between Kabul city centre and the international airport in 2005
which, after the main US contractor had subcontracted it to an Afghan company,
cost $2.4m a kilometre – or four times the average cost of road
construction in Afghanistan.
Often aid is made conditional on spending it in the donor
country.
A striking feature of Kabul is that while the main
roads are paved, the side streets are often no more than packed earth with high
ridges, deep potholes and grey pools of dirty water.
New roads have been built between the cities,
such as Kabul and Kandahar, but these are often too dangerous to use because of
mobile Taliban checkpoints where anybody connected to the central government is
killed on the spot.
$57: The foreign aid per capita to Afghanistan, compared
with $580 per capita in the aftermath of the Bosnian conflict.
$250,000: Typical salary of foreign consultants in
Afghanistan, including 35 per cent hardship allowance and 35 per cent danger
money.
Terrified Collaborator Regime Cancels Annual Holiday Honoring War
Veterans:
“Many People Sacrificed A Lot In The War, And This Is The Only
Day We Have To Honor Them”
“With Thousands Of Foreign Troops Here, Can’t They Protect
One Event?”
April 29, 2009 By Pamela Constable, Washington Post Foreign Service
[Excerpts]
KABUL, April 28 -- The streets of the Afghan capital were
deserted Tuesday in a tense, silent observance of an annual holiday that evokes
an era of patriotic heroism for some Afghans and a period of brutal,
devastating civil war for others.
For the first time in 16 years, there was no military parade
through city streets and no cheering crowd of retired mujaheddin donning
pie-shaped pakul hats and faded combat jackets in memory of their triumphant
guerrilla fight against Soviet occupation forces during the 1980s.
The national stadium and mosque were prepared for
the occasion with multicolored banners and posters of the Afghan holy war’s
fallen heroes, but the public ceremony was abruptly canceled in favor of a
small private remembrance held inside the heavily guarded presidential
compound.
Although the government said it had decided to use the
parade funds to help victims of a recent earthquake, it was widely assumed that
officials were concerned about the possibility of a terrorist attack and felt
they could not protect the gathering.
Some Afghans, especially veterans of the grueling 10-year
war against the former Soviet Union, saw the cancellation of the public
ceremony as an unforgivable slight to the millions of Afghans who were killed,
injured, displaced or orphaned by the conflict, which helped speed the demise
of Soviet communism.
“I am very disappointed. Many people sacrificed a lot in the war, and
this is the only day we have to honor them,” said Mir Agha, 47, a former
fighter whose legs are paralyzed from a shrapnel wound.
With a young boy pushing him in a wheelchair, he
slowly circled the empty parade ground Tuesday.
Naeem Farahi, a legislator from the United Front
Party, which includes many former mujaheddin, said the cancellation was a
national disgrace and a sign of the government’s weakness. “I lost
18 family members in the war, and I feel shame for the souls of all the
martyrs,” he said.
“With thousands of foreign troops here, can’t
they protect one event?”
WELCOME TO VIETN
|