uruknet.info
  اوروكنت.إنفو
     
    informazione dal medio oriente
    information from middle east
    المعلومات من الشرق الأوسط

[ home page] | [ tutte le notizie/all news ] | [ download banner] | [ ultimo aggiornamento/last update 13/07/2019 10:39 ] 21401


english italiano

  [ Subscribe our newsletter!   -   Iscriviti alla nostra newsletter! ]  




[21401]



Uruknet on Alexa


End Gaza Siege
End Gaza Siege

>

:: Segnala Uruknet agli amici. Clicka qui.
:: Invite your friends to Uruknet. Click here.




:: Segnalaci un articolo
:: Tell us of an article






'Ira() has nukes, will use them - we must strike first'

Jerome a Paris, Daily Kos

March 10, 2006

This is the only thing that will change: that particular excuse will not be used:

But otherwise we are watching as the drums of war are beating with increasing strength and we watch, with incredulity mixed wiht disgust and fear, as the exact same steps that led to the Iraq War are now being played out with Iran.

This diary is inspired, and draws content from various diaries with extensive discussions of Iran over at European Tribune:

Iraq could deploy WMD within 48 hours by Colman
Gnomemoot: should we get on the record? by wchurchill
Hear the drums beating... by Metatone
The Monolith Crumbles: Reality and Revisionism in Iran by ghandi
Gnomemoot 0: Iran - problem summary and more questions by Colman
Gnomemoot 0: Iran - what is the problem? by Colman

The disquieting news today come in various press reports:


Iran is only months from bomb technology, says Britain (Guardian)

The west's confrontation with Iran over its nuclear activities intensified yesterday after Britain claimed that Tehran could acquire the technological capability to build a bomb by the end of the year.

So now the concern that triggers action is not nuclear weapons but nuclear technology. Obviously the previous talking points weren't working for them. A five to ten-year window doesn't sound scary enough, does it? (text in italics is commentary borrowed from Colman over at eurotrib)


A day after the International Atomic Energy Agency referred the dispute to the United Nations security council, British officials also indicated that London would back Washington's efforts to impose a UN deadline of about 30 days for Iran's compliance with international demands.

(...)

Until now, European diplomats have referred to a period of five to 10 years during which Iran might potentially build a bomb, while conceding that hard evidence is lacking. By publicly focusing on the level of Iran's technical capabilities, Britain may have shortened the timeframe for a peaceful resolution of the crisis.

"Roll over Tony. Now, sit and beg. Good boy."

The outcome of the extensive discussions on ET was a consensus of sorts, from publicly available information (as analysed by a number of pretty knowledgeable people) that 5-10 years was indeed the period that would be required for Iran to get any meaningful nuclear capacity.

And now, suddenly, Britain (without apparent concertation with other European countries) starts talking about "the end of the year" and about the urgency to do something.


UN unlikely to make Iranian nuclear deal easier (Financial Times)

Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state, on Thursday said a nuclear-armed Iran would be hundreds of times more threatening to US interests, a day after Tehran's nuclear dispute was sent to the UN Security Council.

As officials in the US and Europe considered action against Tehran, Ms Rice indicated that Iran was already the US's biggest challenge because of its alleged meddling in the Middle East.

Heh. Meddling is ok. Alleged meddling is bad, bad, bad.


"If you can take that and multiply it by several hundred, you can imagine Iran with a nuclear weapon and the threat they would then pose to that region," she told a congressional hearing.
(...)

US and European officials say that Tehran could, within one year, master the uranium enrichment technology that could be used for an atomic bomb. So, although diplomats in Europe speak of incremental pressure at the UN, stopping Iran's quest for the technology will, in practice, require an accelerated approach.

So this looks like a coordinated US-UK approach to accelerate things and adapt the evidence to the policy, which seems to be summed up by "Something needs to be done before November!"


The first action, expected next week, is the easiest part: a presidential statement at the Security Council urging Iran to cease enrichment activities, with a deadline of weeks rather than months, according to diplomats. If Tehran failed to respond, the Council would consider targeted sanctions.
But it is at this point that the international front against Iran is likely to start unravelling, with Russia and China, two permanent members of the Security Council with veto power, resisting sanctions.

Again, the same pretense to go the UN route as a figleaf, and to give it up as soon as "obstructive" countries (which will be tainted by their unseemly commercial interests in Iran - check: Russia is selling nuclear technology and Chiina is buying oil) block the "diplomatic route". We tried, they'll say, but these nasty Russians/Chinese chose to oppose us (France is  still on board so far, but how that goes remains to be seen...)


Nicholas Burns, US undersecretary for state, outlined this week how the US had few options at its disposal because of the lack of international support for significant sanctions. The US had no illusions about being able to resolve this crisis through the Security Council and was in the process of seeking to put together an ad hoc coalition of "concerned countries", he told a Washington think-tank.

"Coalition of the Concerned". Heh. They don't even need to be willing...


From Mr Burns' briefing, analysts said it was apparent that the Bush administration's policy relied on making loud threats with little substance, in the hope that Iran would capitulate. If the Islamic regime did not retreat, then the US had not worked out how it would proceed, analysts said.

Now THAT sounds all too familiar...

Loud threats? Check
No substance? Check
Hope? Check.
No back up plan? Check

And of course, no intelligence, as John Murtha reminds us (MSNBC):


In other words, when Cheney makes a threat like that, it falls on deaf ears because they know darn well we couldn't accept it. But the big thing is, as much money as we spend on intelligence, we don't know where the targets are, we don't know exactly what we need to do. So there's no use in even talking about the military strikes.

And just for kicks, bring in Bolton:


US warns of challenge from Iran (BBC)

Washington has warned that Iran's nuclear programme is one of America's biggest challenges, and refused to rule out any option including military.

(...)

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said earlier that Iran might present the US with its toughest challenge.

(...)

US Ambassador John Bolton told the BBC he could not predict whether there would be any consensus at the Security Council which faced, he said, a test as to its ability to deal with the threat of nuclear proliferation.

So the Bush administration has just basically signalled its intention to kill the NPT treaty with its deal with India, but in this case, if the treaties are not respected, it's proof of the UN's failure? Neat, and oh-so-2002-ish.


Mr Bolton said that while much of what Iran did was bluff, its level of irresponsibility illustrated why Tehran should not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons.

This last one is just so rich that it could be a fitting conclusion to this piece.

But all of this found be laughable if it sadly did not point towards a full-fledged PR campaign aimed at the US public:

  • Iran is a longstanding enemy of the US (expect more shows about the hostage crisis, Ayatollah Khomeini and crowds burning flags);

  • It's threatening Israel (cue to President Ahmedjadid's declarations denying the Holocaust and calling for the destruction of Israel);

  • maybe insert a few words about how Iran is supporting the nasty terrorists that kill brave US soldiers in Iraq;

  • and now it's about to get nuclear weapons, even the French/Europeans agree with us on that (cue to French minister making random worried/tough sounding statement about the current negotiations, plus the same repeated in English by a British minister, with the added urgency);

  • a reminder that the UN route was tried, once again, and failed because of the "bought"weak commercially compromised friends Iran has and its stranglehold on oil (cue to random declarations about  "contracts of the century" between Iran and China or Japan).

And there you go, another unavoidable war of choice made for election purposes. Why doesn't it sound far-fetched? Why is it happening again?


:: Article nr. 21401 sent on 10-mar-2006 22:13 ECT

www.uruknet.info?p=21401

Link: www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/3/10/75939/6075



:: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website.

The section for the comments of our readers has been closed, because of many out-of-topics.
Now you can post your own comments into our Facebook page: www.facebook.com/uruknet




Warning: include(./share/share2.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/content/25/8427425/html/vhosts/uruknet/colonna-centrale-pagina-ansi.php on line 385

Warning: include(): Failed opening './share/share2.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/local/php5_6/lib/php') in /home/content/25/8427425/html/vhosts/uruknet/colonna-centrale-pagina-ansi.php on line 385



       
[ Printable version ] | [ Send it to a friend ]


[ Contatto/Contact ] | [ Home Page ] | [Tutte le notizie/All news ]







Uruknet on Twitter




:: RSS updated to 2.0

:: English
:: Italiano



:: Uruknet for your mobile phone:
www.uruknet.mobi


Uruknet on Facebook






:: Motore di ricerca / Search Engine


uruknet
the web



:: Immagini / Pictures


Initial
Middle




The newsletter archive




L'Impero si è fermato a Bahgdad, by Valeria Poletti


Modulo per ordini




subscribe

:: Newsletter

:: Comments


Haq Agency
Haq Agency - English

Haq Agency - Arabic


AMSI
AMSI - Association of Muslim Scholars in Iraq - English

AMSI - Association of Muslim Scholars in Iraq - Arabic




Font size
Carattere
1 2 3





:: All events








     

[ home page] | [ tutte le notizie/all news ] | [ download banner] | [ ultimo aggiornamento/last update 13/07/2019 10:39 ]




Uruknet receives daily many hacking attempts. To prevent this, we have 10 websites on 6 servers in different places. So, if the website is slow or it does not answer, you can recall one of the other web sites: www.uruknet.info www.uruknet.de www.uruknet.biz www.uruknet.org.uk www.uruknet.com www.uruknet.org - www.uruknet.it www.uruknet.eu www.uruknet.net www.uruknet.web.at.it




:: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more info go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
::  We always mention the author and link the original site and page of every article.
uruknet, uruklink, iraq, uruqlink, iraq, irak, irakeno, iraqui, uruk, uruqlink, saddam hussein, baghdad, mesopotamia, babilonia, uday, qusay, udai, qusai,hussein, feddayn, fedayn saddam, mujaheddin, mojahidin, tarek aziz, chalabi, iraqui, baath, ba'ht, Aljazira, aljazeera, Iraq, Saddam Hussein, Palestina, Sharon, Israele, Nasser, ahram, hayat, sharq awsat, iraqwar,irakwar All pictures

url originale



 

I nostri partner - Our Partners:


TEV S.r.l.

TEV S.r.l.: hosting

www.tev.it

Progetto Niz

niz: news management

www.niz.it

Digitbrand

digitbrand: ".it" domains

www.digitbrand.com

Worlwide Mirror Web-Sites:
www.uruknet.info (Main)
www.uruknet.com
www.uruknet.net
www.uruknet.org
www.uruknet.us (USA)
www.uruknet.su (Soviet Union)
www.uruknet.ru (Russia)
www.uruknet.it (Association)
www.uruknet.web.at.it
www.uruknet.biz
www.uruknet.mobi (For Mobile Phones)
www.uruknet.org.uk (UK)
www.uruknet.de (Germany)
www.uruknet.ir (Iran)
www.uruknet.eu (Europe)
wap.uruknet.info (For Mobile Phones)
rss.uruknet.info (For Rss Feeds)
www.uruknet.tel

Vat Number: IT-97475012153